And since I have decided to no longer keep all my best ideas to myself ( :-) ), I offer another idea for a "quiz", though it is not really a quiz, I suppose. More of a "game"?
I call it Code Pong (some of you may know of the classic Pong game). Here's how it would work:
It starts with a piece of rather awful code (likely a function or procedure that is supposed to do X or display certain output). It has all sorts of issues: outright bugs, typos, logic flaws, etc.
Two people sign up to play. And they each take turns applying changes to the code to improve it. The rules for making a change are:
1. You can change 1 line.
2. You can insert up to 3 lines.
3. You can delete up to 3 lines.
4. You can reject the other player's last move.
5. Assert that the game is done.
6. Accept or reject other player's assertion that game is done.
Player must include a description of the change: how does it help get closer to a solution?
What this means is that you can't make one big wholesale change to the code to fix it. Instead, you must work with the other player, sometimes following their lead, sometimes leading the way, to make changes until you believe the code works and all the problems are removed (that is, it not only works, but also is now a program that is easy to understand and maintain.
Here's a simple example: Change the code so that "9" is displayed.
DECLARE
l_index NUMBER;
BEGIN
FOR rec IN (SELECT * FROM all_source WHERE rownum < 10)
LOOP
l_index := l_index + 1;
END LOOP;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE (l_index)
END;
Move 1 (player 1):
Change line 2 to:
l_index PLS_INTEGER;
Explanation: PLS_INTEGER is faster than NUMBER and you do not need NUMBER.
Move 2 (player 2):
Change line 2 to:
l_index PLS_INTEGER := 1;
Explanation: the default initial value is NULL and adding 1 to NULL returns 1. So l_index stays NULL throughout.
Move 3 (player 1):
Assert that game is done.
Move 4 (player2):
Accept; game is done!
What do you think? Too complicated? Too strange?
